- Messages
- 7,508
- Reaction score
- 3,280
I sort of agree, its nice to have it on the schedule, being the Mecca of American motorsport, but it just doesnt really seem to work for stockcars....
Lol, Just so you know I always have to sit in the short shute in 1 and 2... That's where I'll work also.
And the 2008 race... I LOVED that race... The cars were bunched up all the time, Plenty of breaks to go use the restroom or get refreshments, and not miss any racing...
I sort of agree, its nice to have it on the schedule, being the Mecca of American motorsport, but it just doesnt really seem to work for stockcars....
dalejrgamer said:The area is incapable of supporting TWO NFL teams, and it's equally incapable of supporting a NASCAR track since Riverside went to take a dirt nap.
You've totally missed everything I've been saying. We cannot pay the insane ticket prices this track is charging! Pocono charges $70 for a good seat while ACS charges $330! No track, stadium, or anything survives with this kind of idiocy!
To think that the SoCal market can't "support" Nascar is ludicrous. We can support 2 NBA teams, 2 MLB teams, 2 NHL teams, Hollywood, and everything else. SoCal is the largest market that Nascar races in since Nascar does not race inside the NYC media market. The Glen and NHMS aren't close enough to NYC to be literally in the market. ACS is in the Los Angeles market. We can support it fine, but this track charges the most ridiculous prices for what it delivers that I've ever seen.
I haven't read anything else on this thread except the first post.
The way I see it, ACS is in fact a track that needs only one date. BUT, I believe that Kentucky and a second Indy race would be great. Ermm...What? Sadly, I don't see Kentucky coming to Sprint Cup competition any time soon. Pocono, well, how did they get two dates again? Good prices, the Mattioli family. When was the last time a race there wasn't decided on fuel mileage or end under caution? 2009. And why is it always so gloomy there? It's called northeastern summer weather! Who knows. People who live in the northeast. But, it's an underrated track the deserves to keep it's two dates. You were just arguing against it having two dates! Everyone says Darlington should have two races. Here's my simple solution: Keep it to one race and just move it to labor day weekend. Lemme guess, you don't care about tradition? A simple fix right there. Not really. I still say a second race at Indy would be great! Ermm...What? Hopefully on the roadcourse! Boy, that turn 2, turn 6, turn 10, and clockwise configuration will work great with cup cars! (Tony George didn't build it for nothing now, did he? No, he built if for F1, who seven years later would cut it off the schedule because of one 9 degree corner and the fact that it is in America. The damn chairman hates America.) Good Grief, you are an idiot! I take it you don't remember the 2005 US Grand Prix? You are the same guy that was pissing and moaning about wanting to get keep the Crap of Today and restrictor plates in the name of saftey! How does tire failures at 220 MPH sound? Safe? So yeah, that's my two cents. Keep the change.
dalejrgamer said:The Brickyard 400 proved two years straight that it's just a big time failure.
'08 was regreattable, sure. '09 was a big improvement over that, yes. However, before the '08 race, there were 14 Brickyard 400's that were all successes, and built the Brickyard 400 into the prestigious race that it is. Nascar as a sport would take a huge hit by not racing at Indy, and Indy would take a huge hit by not holding the annual Brickyard 400.
Nascar needs races like the Brickyard 400. Nascar will not survive by holding 30 races in the southeast every year. Nascar needs to race in the west, the midwest, the north, the south, everywhere in the USA that can build a suitable facility for Nascar racing. Otherwise growth will not be among the items listed in Nascar's future.