Latest resources

61 - Aisin Supra - NAS daniele
5.00 star(s) 3 ratings
Downloads
147
Updated
42 - Unsponsored Supra - ROA daniele
5.00 star(s) 2 ratings
Downloads
120
Updated
13 - A-Game Mustang - TAL daniele
5.00 star(s) 2 ratings
Downloads
120
Updated
13 - Janiking Supra - ROA daniele
5.00 star(s) 2 ratings
Downloads
119
Updated
66 - Litf Kits 4 Less Supra - MAR1 daniele
66 - Litf Kits 4 Less Supra - MAR1
5.00 star(s) 3 ratings
Downloads
132
Updated

To Matt O and the SRD forum

Status
Not open for further replies.

hereugo

Lurker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Well speak of the devil Matt, here I am Matt (sb70/house of hardtops). This of course may be a futile attempt to get whatever across to you and point out your contradictions right here in your own forum. Main reason being the fact Matt O loves to censor away and lock entire threads he feels challenged or threatened in whatever way. And normally threads such as the previous two in where you're inviting this sort of thing in the first place....And of course, I'm one to defend myself and those around me from your community assassination attempts of not only myself & Denis, but his new site which is something you shouldn't even be involving yourself with. To this comment of yours...

So please, give it a break that you just making mods for the fun of it and to help the community. If that was the case, why the hard feeling that JJ was working on a truck mod while you guys were? All of a sudden your crying foul that there is no need for 2 truck mods. It just hurts the community. JJ gracefully bowed out and didn't complete his truck mod for the better of the community. Now all of a sudden, your making a COT mod when there is already one out there. What happened to the better for the community just to have 1 mod?

Okay, yet it was perfectly alright for JJ to start on his original cot mod when there was already two others out (RNR, Nisbett) before Denis even attempted one? Where's the logic in that Matt, and why weren't you making a similar case then? Fact of the matter is we can create whatever we wish considering we're investing our own free time at it. We set out to build a high detail build on the scale of something that's never been attempted before, we're pleased with the result as are others. So we should have refrained from an agreed upon project again why? Because JJ simply 'announced' he was undertaking a similar project? You also seem to forget that he announced he needed the communities help for the thing to even see the light of day before it was even released. I think it's time for you to abandon this tired angle of trying to point the finger at us as doing something wrong by providing a community mod...For free!

Also, zero objection from Matt O regarding the release of JJ's (or whoever's cot mod) hours on the heels of the Rioux one. No doubt on purpose, and no doubt to divide as many in the community as possible by design. Denis could have done similar when they released the spoiler a few weeks ago, and he would have if that was his priority....But obviously it's not. He's holding off for accuracy and build quality which is what we're all about.

You can argue in whatever mod you're in support of to no end, but here we are with you calling us out as the bad guys again with your flawed logic. Here's the truth behind the cot mods no matter which one you're in support of. When bullring received that mod from JJ it was about 75 percent complete except for zero textures and a few odds and ends. They spent roughly three months texturing that mod out and piecing it together with pre existing pieces from other mods like the gn63 mod. Whereas the Rioux build took upwards of a year, was totally gone through yet again for V2, and here it is a third time around now to polish it even more for this all important spoiler feature. That's A LOT of work and dedication, way more than three months on a semi finished project. Yet the Rioux team is at fault for feeling compelled to defend a project they spent over a year perfecting from the ground up and dumped a ton of time into? I don't think so Matt. I think it's human nature for anybody to stand up and defend that sort of expelled effort, especially when it's shared with the public with no questions asked.

Aside from the mods, the way you treated Denis Rioux here is a joke. Let me point out what should be obvious by now to anybody reading this including you, Denis Rioux is a huge asset when it comes to this thing. Nobody has invested the sort of time he has to provide mods into the double digits for anybody to freely use. And nobody is more skilled as a modeler when it comes to getting models into the sim which gives us these mods to start with. I haven't seen Matt O dump upwards of ten mods on the community. Denis is a big asset to us all and that's undeniable at this stage of things. The fact that you play dumb to that, let alone treat him like he's just another kid that signed up to your painting site is pathetic.

So that's where we are. Only you no doubt as Jack pointed out are intent on taking it all a step further by calling out myself and others as 'bashers' and the 'bad guys'....Still! And as far as bashing goes, here's a great example of that courtesy of one of your own. Only the community never got to see that one because Matt O happened to sweep it under the rug before, god forbid, Matt O's friendly site may be mistaken for even worse bashers than the supposed 'bad guys' over at Rioux. That was directed at BCR, the worst of it in black (the personal attack of an avatar) edited out by me. That would be like me attacking 'Hoosierdaddy's' personal avatar (that would be a bash to really complain about no doubt, huh Matt?)




You also mentioned a Hitler video and the RuRa forum which is alluding to me personally with this:

make youtube videos comparing everyone who doesn't like your mod to Hitler...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RdeDoQm8vs"]YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
Everyone Matt? Lets recap that stupidity, an entire release thread for the last Rioux build was hijacked at the RuRa forum (in protest of their own members there) by a certain few with nothing else in mind but to attack me personally (and I wasn't even involved in the thread!) That hasn't happened to any announcement threads involving JJ, or bulring, so who is being biased here? After that Hitler video though, and after 1,000 plus views on that thread, it too was swept under the rug. And lets not forget your 'everyone' ('nextelracer' who instigated it) was also just banned from the bullring (who you support obviously) for stirring up a bunch of havoc there, was he not?

So how about the following, don't wield your admin power to sweep this one under the rug or lock it up (unless it gets hairy of course) But this agenda to make us all out to be bad guys pointing out this & that when you and your own members are just as guilty as anybody else, enough with that, alright? You do your thing and we will do ours, lose the chip on your shoulder please.
 

James Hodge

The Honda Guy
Moderator
Messages
1,597
Reaction score
2,001
 

hereugo

Lurker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What's wrong with my avatar?

Nothing whatsoever (never said there was). I bring it up just as an example, next to BC as far as I know, you guys use images of yourselves as avatars on this thing. Now if somebody said there is something wrong with it, or use it as a means to cheap shot you, I think that's about as low of bash as you can go, agreed?

I'm just illustrating a point here, Matt can put forth remarks like "I'd be embarrassed to associate myself with those members of Rioux mods who resort to bashing"...Yet Matt's own painting staff here is prone to resort to some of the worst examples of net bashing, and he knows this as evident in the example above. Point is, nothing said by the members of Rioux mods regarding a sim mod is even in the same league as that.
 

MattSRD28

SRD Pick'em Series Commissioner
Moderator
Messages
6,416
Reaction score
4,987
You guys do realize that the more you say this stuff in public, the more ridiculous you look, right?

You could have handled this in private conversations, but you're airing this out in public? Why? There's only one reason - you're trying to make Matt O'Reilly look as bad as possible in public. That says something about you, as it would about anyone publicly trying to make someone else look bad.

I'm not trying to defend Matt here. Matt can defend himself, though I'm not sure why he does it in public to be honest. All I'm saying is that it's THIS that tears the NR2003 community apart. By continuing to air your dirty laundry out in public, that's all you're really accomplishing.
 
Last edited:

hereugo

Lurker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Not really though Matt. Same as that episode at RuRa which resulted in that Hitler video; I'm merely defending myself. C'mon, that was ridiculous and uncalled for. You have a group working hard on a project, setting aside free time to make it happen, then somehow it's tolerable to have a select few turn the entire announcement for the project into page after page of personal jabs directed at one individual? Let alone Matt O spinning it as "calling everybody Hitler that didn't support their mod". Wrong, that's just a lie. Honestly I think they looked ridiculous for condoning it which is why they decided on deleting the entire thread once Hitler turned it all into a stage play. Same here again with Matt O, "Rioux are the bad guys" routine over and over again. No, we're not the 'bad guys' anymore than any other group on the net.

As Jack pointed out, we're sick of that. But here we are at SRD (frequently visited site in a dwindling community) and Matt O is still on this agenda to put it across to everybody that we are 'such bad guys'. The way I see it, it becomes necessary to defend that rhetoric at some point which is what I'm doing here. I don't think I look ridiculous for defending myself (and Denis) just being on the level here in regard to it all.

What is it honestly that Matt O would like to see happen here? Do we really want to be less a Denis Rioux in this community? Is there a checklist of mods that we shouldn't attempt just because John Johnston made an announcement somewhere that he's creating one? That's the ridiculous part of it all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top